Journalist Nikhil Wagle Faces Legal Action Over Alleged Offensive Remarks Against Modi, Advani

PUNE: A case has been registered in Pune against veteran journalist Nikhil Wagle for purportedly making offensive remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and veteran BJP leader L K Advani following the latter's Bharat Ratna award, as confirmed by police sources on Friday.

The FIR stemmed from a complaint lodged by a local BJP leader, Sunil Deodhar, against Wagle, citing alleged violations of sections 153A (prom
oting enmity between different groups), 500 (defamation), and 505 (statements conducing to public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Wagle, a prominent figure in media circles, allegedly made the contentious comments on social media platforms, specifically targeting Modi and Advani after the announcement of Advani's Bharat Ratna honor, India's highest civilian accolade.

Furthermore, amidst the controversy, the Pune BJP has urged the police to disallow the 'Nirbhaya Bano' rally scheduled to feature Wagle as one of the speakers. The rally was organized in protest against Wagle's comments regarding the Prime Minister and Advani.

However, despite police protection, Wagle faced hostility en route to the event venue. His vehicle was reportedly attacked at Khandoji Baba Chowk, prompting swift intervention from Congress and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) supporters, who escorted him to safety.

Wagle, along with fellow speakers Amol Palekar and Aseem Sarode, was scheduled to address the 'Nirbhaya Bano' public meet, organized by Rasta Seva Dal and other organizations, at Sane Guruji Smarak. Despite facing opposition from BJP supporters, Wagle asserted that police permission had been obtained for the event, and safety measures were ensured by Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) supporters.

The incident reflects the heightened tensions surrounding freedom of expression and political dissent in the country, particularly in the wake of contentious statements made by public figures. As legal proceedings unfold, the case against Nikhil Wagle continues to draw attention to the delicate balance between freedom of speech and accountability in a democratic society. 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post